In a unanimous decision , the Supreme Court declared that law enforcement cannot search a suspect’s cell phone without first obtaining a warrant. Previously, police officers were allowed to engage in warrantless searches of mobile phones when they arrested a suspect. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Roberts explained that given the vast amount of information stored on cell phones, this practice should no longer be permitted. The decision signals another victory for Supreme Court litigator and Stanford Law professor Jeffrey Fisher, who will be featured in our upcoming film on the confrontation clause. To learn more about search warrants and our constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, watch our award-winning film on the landmark 4th Amendment case, Mapp v. Ohio.
Related News
- Political gerrymandering goes before the Supreme Court
- Supreme Court rules against North Carolina’s race-based gerrymandering
- The Constitution Project Celebrates the Supreme Court’s New Term
- The Supreme Court Questions Warrantless Cell Phone Searches
- New Supreme Court Decision Expands Warrantless Searches of Homes
Archives
- January 2023
- September 2020
- August 2019
- September 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- September 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- September 2012
- April 2012
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010